18 Sep
How funny money will keep this rally going, and why M2 tells us how it will end
Posted in General Analysis & Commentary, Long Term Analysis by Bob English at 12:50:43 13 CommentsWhile much has been made of the expiration of the Federal Reserve’s $300 Billion quantitative easing program, there are still many more ways in which the Fed can pump the markets with liquidity that need never be paid back to the recipients. In this article, we take a look at the ramifications of some recent developments with regard to the Treasury and Federal Reserve that will again provide fodder to the equities markets, as well as revisiting our previous work on how money supply has impacted the economy and what it tells us of the potential correction down the road.
As we wrote two days ago, Treasury is effectively winding down its Supplemental Financing Program, the stated intention of which on its inception in September 2008 was to, “drain reserves from the banking system, and therefore offset the reserve impact of recent Federal Reserve lending and liquidity initiatives.” Delving into the mechanics of it, here is what happened:
Treasury announced special auctions for cash management bills, the proceeds of which were placed on deposit with the Federal Reserve in a special account (as opposed to the proceeds being kept by Treasury to fund the government). This allowed the Federal Reserve to use these funds (which topped out at $558.9 Billion in November 2008) to borrow or buy securities primarily from banks and broker dealers to help “unfreeze the credit markets.” The Fed could have simply borrowed or bought securities with money it printed, but this would have expanded its balance sheet by creating excess reserves in the accounts that banks are required to keep with the Fed. These reserves can be multiplied by at least ten times and used by banks for lending. At the time, the Fed was rightfully concerned about inflation becoming unmanageable once the credit markets thawed, and about being able to keep the Fed overnight lending rate (fed funds target rate) above zero. Accordingly, Treasury’s SFP helped to keep the Fed balance sheet under control (if you can call a multiple hundred percentage increase “under control”). The amount of money that flowed into the financial markets from the SFP was the same as it would have been had the Fed printed the money; however, SFP money could not be multiplied by banks.
Congress granted the authority to the Fed to pay interest on excess reserves held by banks on deposit with it as of October 1, 2008. This new tool obviated the need for the SFP as the Fed could now simply incentivize banks to not lend against their excess reserves (by paying them interest to keep their reserves at the Fed). Accordingly, in November 2008, Treasury announced it would reduce the SFP, and it has held steadily at $200 Billion for most of 2009.
On Wednesday, Treasury announced that it would allow the SFP to “decrease in the coming weeks to $15 billion, as outstanding Supplementary Financing Program bills mature and are not rolled over.” As we wrote above, Treasury issued special cash management bills as opposed to its standard arsenal of regularly auctioned bills (such as the 4 Week, 3 Month and 6 Month Bills). We have identified these bills (all were 70 day duration) by their CUSIP, auction amount, primary dealer take (to be explained later) and maturity date (each of which is a Thursday):
| CUSIP | Total Amount | Primary Dealer Amt | Maturity Date |
| 912795S36 | $35 Billion | $24.3 Billion | Sep 24 2009 |
| 912795P54 | $35 Billion | $16.7 Billion | Oct 1 2009 |
| 912795P62 | $30 Billion | $12.6 Billion | Oct 8 2009 |
| 912795P70 | $35 Billion | $23.3 Billion | Oct 15 2009 |
| 912795S44 | $35 Billion | $14.3 Billion | Oct 22 2009 |
| 912795P96 | $30 Billion | $22.9 Billion | Oct 29 2009 |
| Total | $200 Billion | $114.1 Billion |
Upon maturity, the SFP account at the Fed will be deducted by the total auction amount with the funds returned to the purchasers of the bills. The consequences of this are:
- Should the Federal Reserve require additional funds to finance its buying and borrowing of securities (Agency POMO, MBS purchase, TALF, etc.), it will need to print money in the amount that the SFP has been decreased. This is not too much of a long term issue since, as we wrote above, it is able to pay interest on excess bank reserves to keep inflation in check.
- Treasury can now issue longer term Notes and Bonds to replace the shorter term 70 day cash management bills. This is more important to Treasury’s long term objectives, especially as it quickly approaches the $12.1 Trillion debt ceiling this fall.
- Without the rollover of the $185 Billion in cash management bills, assuming constant demand for shorter duration bills, the regularly scheduled Treasury Bill auctions (4 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, etc.) should experience increased demand, which will put downwards pressure on short term rates and keep the US Dollar carry trade alive and well (a topic for another article).
- Because primary dealers will not be expected to buy any more of these SFP cash management bills, they may use these funds for other purposes.
As to 4, above, what might these purposes be? As we have seen with the permanent open market operations (POMO), it appears that much of the stock market ramp (at least for the first half of the 2009 rally) was demonstrably accomplished with POMO funds paid to primary dealers that plowed the money into stocks. We have also correlated large increases in bank non-borrowed excess reserves (green in chart below) with stock market ramps. The chart from the previous post is updated here:
Indeed, because the major primary dealers are US banks, most of the $114.1 Billion returned to them upon maturity of the SFP bills will end up in this category of non-borrowed excess reserves. Some of it may be required to support future Treasury auctions, especially if Treasury ups the longer dated auctions that have less foreign support (primary dealers are required to soak up excess supply at auctions). Indeed, next week, the 2 Year, 5 Year and 7 Year offering amounts have each been increased by $1 Billion. However, the potential is for at least a sizable portion of the $30 to $35 Billion to hit the equities markets each of the next six Thursdays after having been leveraged by 10 to 100 times or more.
Also, though quantitative easing in the form of Treasury POMOs is ending soon as it approaches the $300 Billion ceiling, the Fed is compensating with increased Agency POMOs (another $4 Billion bought today, $285 Billion to date), not to mention a total of $651 Billion in mortgage backed securities bought by the Fed this year.
The above is our warning to the shorts. Now, our warning to the longs. Below is our updated chart of M2 Money Supply Volatility, that we first brought to our readers’ attention in late July 2009.
The unprecedented contraction in money supply, as measured by 13 week percent change M2 non-seasonally adjusted money supply(yellow in chart), only intensified into early September 2008, as evidenced by the double dip at the far right edge. What this tells us is that the equities rally is running on vapors (likely in large part from the bank non-borrowed excess reserves portion of M0), with nothing to back it up (in the form of money circulating in the broader economy) once the vapors disappear.
Interestingly, Wednesday’s rally to 1074 in the cash S&P 500 touched a crucial level in the heavily traded SPY (S&P 500 exchange traded fund), which is the volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the entire down move from the October 11, 2007 high. The bulls and bears are thus at a crucial equilibrium point, and the coming weeks will announce the medium term winner.
In short, traders should be mindful of the potential for massive buying sprees as the $114.1 Billion is returned to primary dealers over the next six weeks (along with continued Agency POMO and MBS purchases) and also of the potential for the floor to fall out from under this rally once the funny money dries up. The next downturn will not be instantaneous, and there will be warning signs, which we will report on as always.
We are neither perma bears nor perma bulls, but are fortunate to have the luxury of reevaluating the markets on a day to day basis and to be able to adjust accordingly. True to history, it will be the longer term investors that will ultimately bear the brunt of this monetary and fiscal malfeasance.
Disclosure: No positions as of time of publication.



antiphos
on September 20 2009 at 11:50:35
Tyler at Zero Hedge repeated your argument here and a poster responded with this comment. I would be interested to hear your take on it.
_________________________________________________
There is a bit of a flaw in your analysis.
You state that the bills will mature without the requirement that the primary dealers will roll those bills at maturity.
You then posit that the primary dealers will use those funds to gun the equity market.
That is a nice fairy tale but makes no sense.
First of all it is quite unlikely that the primary dealer community would hold that bill for 70 days. They own the bill at a yield of 0.185 basis points.
For the sake of simplicity let us assume that they are able to finance them at percent. They make 18.5 basis point per day on their holding.
That would not be an efficient use of scarce capital in an era when balance sheet space is scarce.
In an environment in which the FOMC has promised cheap financing for an extended period, balance sheet would be allocated to buying the 2 year note (or some other instrument with a longer maturity) when it sags some place north of 1.00 percent. There is at least a little juice in that trade.
Foreign central banks and money funds buy piles of bills. I would bet my money that the bills were quickly distributed to those investors.
Separately, a dealer is not going to hold a security for 70 days.
Furthermore, in the auction of the bill which matures this week the primary dealers took just $ 24.3 billion so even if your far out assumption is correct, then the amount of leverage employed would drop rather quickly from the fanciful number which you cite.
Primary dealers are traders and as a general rule it is anathema to hold a liquid for the 70 days which the post suggests.
Tweets that mention How funny money will keep this rally going, and why M2 tells us how it will end | The Precision Report -- Topsy.com
on September 20 2009 at 12:34:24
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeremy Veum. Jeremy Veum said: http://tinyurl.com/lerqmy "How funny money will keep this rally going, and why M2 tells us how it will end. $$ [...]
dbarrett
on September 22 2009 at 23:22:07
Thanks for the detailed explanation. However, perhaps some other readers are having some of the same questions that I after having read your explanation.
It seems like the liquidity that this money in the Feds SFP account was drained from the money supply last year and is now being re-injected as the Fed uses this money to purchase securities. Is that correct?
Why can’t the banks who receive money by selling securities to the Fed today (with the Fed using money in the special SFP account to buy them) loan it out and use leverage of 10:1? You indicated that if the Fed had printed the money they could use leverage on these excess reserves but they could NOT do it if the money came from the SFP account.
Bob English
on September 23 2009 at 17:53:32
@dbarret: Not sure if I understand your questions correctly, but you might be conflating the SFP phenomenon with the quantitative easing/POMO phenomenon. In the latter, the Fed is purchasing securities. In the former (SFP), there are two main things going on:
1. The money tied up in Treasuries by primary dealers to the tune of 114.1 B will be returned and may be leveraged by them to pump equities. They may have sold some or all of it–we don’t know how much. It could also be that 100% of it will simply be rolled into buying new Treasuries at the regular auctions instead of pumping equities. But I doubt it. Out of a total return of $185 B, I would be very surprised if a substantial portion did not show up in the markets.
2. If the Fed wants to keep its lending operations at the same level, it will need to increase the monetary base.
However, in the second case, it will be contributing to borrowed bank excess reserves, which we have not necessarily found to be correlated with equity ramps. Rather the permanent operations (separate from SFP–e.g. POMO) go into bank non-borrowed excess reserves, which is correlated to equity ramps. So 1, above instead of 2 will likely be the driving factor for equities.
On your second question, the SFP account at the Fed has only been used for lending, not permanent purchases. Had the Fed printed the money for its lending out to financial institutions (as opposed to using the SFP), it would have gone into the monetary base and could have been leveraged. Though this was a legitimage fear at the time, it was a non-starter because, as we found out later, banks did not lend with money that was lent to them by the Fed (at least in a way that would show up in the stock market). Again, it’s the permanent Fed purchases that matter, and the return of the SFP funds is a permanent action that is very similar to QE/POMO, which is shown to be correlated to equities ramps.
Bob English
on September 23 2009 at 18:04:04
@antiphos: It’s probably the case that the primary dealers don’t hold all the bills for the entire duration. I don’t know how much they hold and don’t have the ability to find out. What I do know is the incredible correlation between POMO and equity ramps. Look at the chart of POMO days vs. non-POMO days in the first 3 months of the 2009 rally in our G.U.T. post under “Articles”. Expiration of SFP is not a permanent Fed operation, but closely mimics the mechanics of it. Instead of buying Treasuries, they’re allowed to expire. Then, large amounts of money are (likely) hitting primary dealer accounts. To me, future equity ramps as a result are not only possible, but likely.
Can Money Supply Tell Us How the Funny Money Rally Will End? | Wall St. Cheat Sheet
on September 24 2009 at 06:02:37
[...] This is a guest post by Precision Capital Management. [...]
The future of liquidity injections | The Precision Report
on September 24 2009 at 09:25:34
[...] we wrote last week, the wind down of Treasury’s Supplementary Financing Program (SFP) begins today, with $35 B in the program not being rolled over, $24.3 B of which was initially [...]
Money Markets are the New Suspenders | Wall St. Cheat Sheet
on September 30 2009 at 09:31:59
[...] 2010, especially with the help of another $634834 billion in MBS and Agency POMO into next March (not to mention the possible Treasury SFP wind-down effect to the tune of $114 to 185 billion). The Fed must be perfect, however, as any new panic will [...]
It’s October 1, S&P down 20 pts, you’re Chairman of the Fed. What do you do? | Froogalizer.com
on October 1 2009 at 14:30:30
[...] SFP wind-down–$35 billion–check. [...]
urbxzwbq
on October 5 2009 at 11:20:02
urbxzwbq…
urbxzwbq…
jcvyhhlr
on October 19 2009 at 02:37:50
jcvyhhlr…
jcvyhhlr…
fix your credit free
on October 19 2009 at 11:03:44
fix your credit free…
Wow – nice blog. I like it alot!…
Non-Borrowed Excess Reserve and the US Stock Markets « U.Pro.Fish
on January 9 2010 at 06:46:49
[...] This article says the increase in NBER is important, because as banks do not have to pay back NBER to the Fed, banks can freely lend this money, and banks lent this to hedge funds and prop desks to speculate on stock market. (I guess this type of lending was not reflected in increase of M2 because it was not deposited back? Does this make any sense? Your teaching appreciated.) [...]